Hamlet: A Meaningful Madness

[ * It’s been many years since I first saw Hamlet, but I went and saw a local performance the other night and comments I overheard got me to thinking that I differ from the viewers who believe Hamlet was really mad. And here are my reasons. ]


There are many who believe Hamlet is genuinely mad throughout most of the play. Likewise, there are many who believe Hamlet begins by acting crazy, and then slowly descends into madness as events progress. Thus, I appear to be in the minority, since I don’t believe Hamlet ever loses his mental faculties. It is true that he gets emotional at certain times, but getting emotional and going bonkers are two different things.

I hold to my belief on this issue because of the following: at no time from the beginning of the play until the crazy antics of Hamlet begin does Hamlet show any inclination or weakness to warrant a belief in the alleged madness. Quite the contrary; when Gertrude asks Hamlet why he seems to take a particular stance to something as common as death (pertaining to the alleged long mourning period over his father); Hamlet admits his special inclination toward the particular over common. And Hamlet claims it with a very telling line: “These indeed seem, for they are actions that a man might play, but I have that within which passes show; these but the trappings and the suits of woe” – (1.2.83-86). In other words, prior to Hamlet seeing the ghost of his father, his mindset already dwells on how emotions or true motives can be hidden with pretend actions. And after the King and Queen exit Hamlet laments the situation, and shows his anger over how quickly his mother jumped into his uncle’s bed. Yet, we again see Hamlet’s tendency to hide his true emotions: “It is not, nor it cannot come to good. But break my heart, for I must hold my tongue” – (1.2.157-158). This same mindset is shown when Hamlet is made aware of the ghost by Horatio, Marcellus, and Barnardo, urging them to remain silent: “I pray you all, if you have hitherto concealed this sight, let it be tenable in your silence still” – (1.2.246-248). And immediately following the conversation with his father’s spirit Hamlet again swears them to secrecy. He also warns them not to be alarmed or give it away when they see him acting strange: “how strange or odd some’er I bear myself (As I per chance hereafter shall think meet to put an antic disposition on)” – (1.5.170-172).

Additionally, Hamlet’s character is clearly closer to his dead father (who is portrayed as a competent king, leader, and husband), not like his weaker uncle. That inherited strength, plus years of parental teaching, along with his new found singleness of purpose, and the multi-shown mindset of camouflaging his true motives leads me to conclude Hamlet never lost touch with reality. And since there is not a single dialogue or weak character trait attributed to Hamlet prior to the antics beginning, I see no reason to think Shakespeare had any such intent during the writing.


7 thoughts on “Hamlet: A Meaningful Madness

  1. Mary Cathleen Clark February 29, 2016 / 3:31 am

    I have to admit, other than in school and I had to, I have never read Shakespeare. Just couldn’t get into it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • jwtatfbc February 29, 2016 / 3:46 am

      The language stops a lot of people, my friend. But if you think about the story of Hamlet it fits right along with the kind of stuff you write; just spoken in Old English.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Mary Cathleen Clark February 29, 2016 / 4:08 am

        Yes, a different style of writing back then. Sadly, I have read very few classic works. I’ve tried but can’t get into the story.

        Liked by 1 person

      • jwtatfbc February 29, 2016 / 4:13 am

        Sad, yes, but understandable. Although many have been redone in modern films and books with different titles that have gained the same kind of popularity.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. poeturja July 22, 2016 / 3:51 pm

    Oh, I like this. I’m a huge Shakespeare fan and also always felt that Hamlet was not mad. I like the way you backed up your reasons, too. I once tried to write a short story sympathetic to Lady Macbeth but decided to leave it alone 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • jwtatfbc July 23, 2016 / 12:34 am

      I thank you for the response, Clarissa. Once I got beyond the Old English I was able to enjoy Shakespeare, and have for many years now.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. poeturja July 23, 2016 / 3:51 pm

    Kinda if you relax, while reading, without tensing, the meaning flows out into everyday English 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s